Hello @arishmaurya , it is on the add-forge-now admin dashboard view but isn't open publicly yet (from @ardumont 's comment on https://forge.softwareheritage.org/T4078).

In T3230#83166, @VickyMerzOwn wrote:

Hey, I would like to work on this issue.

Sometimes these variants site side by side with the plain text ones

I didn't understand what site here means.

While annotating, are we expected to use native Python Datatypes (like str, int, float etc.) or do I use the NewType class of the Type library as in the example below:

Hey, I would like to work on this issue.

Sometimes these variants site side by side with the plain text ones

I didn't understand what site here means.
Could anyone help me with more info about the issue?

Indeed, it looks like @ardumont already did this in D6630. Sorry

Hi, @vlorentz I have checked swh/loader/svn/svn.py, and it is annotated, can you guide me where are the annotations required.

Hi, @vlorentz @zack Is this task still valid?

@Yavnikaa More generally, yes you can work on easy hack, no need to ask permission to
try and solve it your way. Just choose one and try to hack on it. Then, when you feel it
solves the problem at hand, your end goal is to submit a patch as a phabricator diff
[1].

In T3152#82777, @Yavnikaa wrote:

Hello. Can I please take this up?

Hello. Can I please take this up?

hey @ardumont can you tell me briefly how to setup this do i have to use docker image or anything else this is my first time please explain a little

Any actions required in this task?

Any actions required in this task?

@arishmauryaa I've finished the task already though :(
It's ready for a diff
If there's anything else to add, maybe you could add that?

@bchauvet please elaborate this issue a little bit i want to work on this and how can i setup this

hey @bchauvet , i want to work on this. @anirudhlakhotia i would love to collaboratively work on this issue

Hey @bchauvet ,
I'd like to give this a shot.
Since the submission date is already present, will the name of the moderator suffice?

Hey @ardumont!
I'm unable to run swh-web using the docker images, more details here
Could you please help me out with this?

Hey @ardumont!
I'm unable to run swh-web using the docker images, more details here
Could you please help me out with this?

sir, can you give me an example of how the tooltip should look?

I am working on this task and almost ready to deploy a PR.

@bchauvet can I contribute to this.

In T4073#82406, @gabbyprecious wrote:

Hi ardumout, I will like to work on this if available

If you want people to notice your highlight you need to prefix the name with @, so @bchauvet here (and not make typo on them, use the proposal from phabricator ui here ;).

it's ardumont (i won't be highlighted otherwise;)

bchauvet, can I work on this?

Hi ardumout, I will like to work on this if available

Maybe look for some 'tooltip' keyword in the swh-web repository.
And that might give some insight as how we are using it [1]?

hey sir, I am new to this platform. I have been looking around for how this works and it's a bit tricky. I hope you can help me by breaking it into steps so I can follow through.

see my comment [1] which is still mostly valid (beyond the linked code source line which is not the same for this need).

hey there, I would like to work on this task. please guide me on what is to be done.

Hello, it's on the add-forge-now admin dashboard view (which lists add-forge-now requsets).

@bchauvet i want to work on this issue can you please guide me where i have to add link ?

Thanks. Appreciate the help.

so can you explain about the issue a little more

Hi @vlorentz I would like to work on this task too.

Hi @vlorentz this will be my first contribution for Software Heritage so can you explain about the issue a little more. Also I am having some problems installing Arcanist (fatal error with php not getting resolved)into my system. Will it be possible to commit directly on github.

@lucifer4j There are still many missing annotations. And yes, TypedDict would be nice

Hi! I intended to work on this so I looked through the code in swh.scheduler.backend and swh.scheduler.interface. Both files seem to have type annotations (except at a couple of places?). At a few places, the types are mentioned in docstrings but AFAICS those are only for dict keys/list items. So, I wanted to ask if this task is still valid?

ping here that the web page for the deposit staging is still the same as in production (without the banner):
https://deposit.staging.swh.network/

It has been implemented and deployed to production, closing this.

It has been implemented and deployed to production, closing this.

published ^