- User Since
- Feb 14 2017, 10:57 AM (162 w, 4 d)
Mon, Mar 23
Fri, Mar 20
Thu, Mar 19
Mon, Mar 16
@vlorentz can we say that your new validator resolves this?
Here is the first draft:
Fri, Mar 13
Thu, Mar 12
Wed, Mar 11
Thanks @olasd for the accurate and detailed summary !
Feb 27 2020
Thanks @anlambert ! That's great news !!
Feb 20 2020
After discussion with @rdicosmo, GitHub is the best place for the community that wants to use the CodeMeta Generator.
Feb 14 2020
I actually don't have it in both cases.
I'm firefox quantum 68.2
name: GNU Go origin: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/gnugo.git archived-url: https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/http://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/gnugo.git/directory/ SWH-ID (the object that might compile and run): /api/1/vault/directory/00b4bcdff80e8b3c180e481c76709fc876958b8a/ environment needed:
Feb 13 2020
Feb 12 2020
Thanks @anlambert for the detailed explanation.
This is exactly right !
Thanks for your input.
I agree with you that for the end user this looks like a problem.
On the other hand, we are an infrastructure that needs to consider many platforms for the long term, so we can't pick and choose whatever feels more comfortable for the user.
Feb 10 2020
Feb 7 2020
@vlorentz I'm not sure it is an easy hack, could you review the task and decide?
Feb 6 2020
@anlambert: Can you also update this page as well- https://docs.softwareheritage.org/devel/swh-model/persistent-identifiers.html
Adding the first item (hal-02446202) to the references?
Feb 5 2020
Jan 30 2020
Jan 28 2020
Jan 27 2020
Jan 26 2020
Jan 23 2020
Jan 22 2020
Jan 21 2020
Jan 14 2020
Jan 10 2020
I'll do the translation so I'm claiming the task.
Jan 9 2020
Jan 8 2020
@anlambert: great. Thanks !
Jan 7 2020
Dec 20 2019
Dec 19 2019
Dec 17 2019
@vlorentz : If you can check the Slug in the deposit DB of this artifact, it might be je-suis-gpl
And do the deposit with the same Slug for linking purposes.
The deposit is visible and accessible on HAL without a link to SWH (because we rejected it).
- this ticket is open on HAL side as well, but I don't know at what priority level.
- we do check and than we reject it (this is why there is no link)
- I tagged it with [HAL] because I assume we want to keep the rejection but we need to make sure it is fixed
I can change the title to Make sure this is fixed
Dec 16 2019
Dec 14 2019
This might be resolved with T2149 ?