- User Since
- Sep 9 2015, 9:17 PM (227 w, 4 d)
Fri, Jan 10
Mon, Dec 30
Dec 6 2019
Dec 4 2019
This is now done
This is now resolved, we have save.softwareheritage.org
Nov 9 2019
Nov 8 2019
Nov 1 2019
Oct 15 2019
Oct 14 2019
Oct 8 2019
Oct 1 2019
Sep 27 2019
We do need the submenus, this will be clear in a couple of weeks
Sep 26 2019
Sep 25 2019
Very nice, that's a GO for me :-)
Cool, can we try to have the 4 columns of "you can help" on the same row, like the ones below?
Sep 22 2019
Sep 19 2019
Sep 18 2019
I fully support this last proposal, that makes total sense.
I would like to see an API entrypoint that provides the information that will go in archive.s.o/coverage.
Sep 12 2019
Here is an interesting update on the issue of listing Maven Central. Great people at the FASTEN EU project are analyzing software dependencies and for that they are working on a tool to download projects from various sources, including Maven.
The tool is here: https://github.com/fasten-project/source-populate
It appears to be more about downloading a known project source than listing the content of a repository, but we could try and share efforts in this space.
Sep 9 2019
sorry for the ultra-late reply, this message has been on the stack for a
Aug 23 2019
It turns out we can create https redirection easily, ans Gandi provides free SSL certificates for single domain redirections on domains hosted by them.
This has been tested on the new http+https redirection from save.softwareheritage.org to https://archive.softwareheritage.org/save, and should now be put in place for all the other redirections.
@olasd, may you add the info on the account that has the proper right for this?
Aug 21 2019
This is now particularly imporant, following the sunset announcement from Bitbucket, here: https://bitbucket.org/blog/sunsetting-mercurial-support-in-bitbucket
Aug 17 2019
Aug 7 2019
That is definitely worth doing, as /browse/origin/save is not really
Please make sure the old URL returns a permanent redirection (301) to the
Aug 4 2019
Reopening this, as the vertical units in the graphs are now wrong for the "commits" and "origins" images. They all show the 0, 2B, 4B, 6B, 8B scale that is appropriate only for the file count
Jun 26 2019
Jun 17 2019
Jun 7 2019
Duplicate of T1657
Jun 6 2019
Is this committed?
Jun 4 2019
Jun 3 2019
May 24 2019
May 22 2019
A document for describing the @software bibtex entry is now created, and collaboration can go on at https://gitlab.inria.fr/gt-sw-citation/bibtex-sw-entry
May 17 2019
May 16 2019
May 7 2019
May 6 2019
May 2 2019
Thanks... looks like the tasks have been properly scheduled, but they have
not been executed... some more polishing may be needed ...
Apr 22 2019
Apr 20 2019
Apr 19 2019
Are there any blockers left? It would be really nice to roll this out in the very near future.