@bchauvet We can close this now that we have a first iteration of the ui deployed on staging, can't we?
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Apr 7 2022
Apr 5 2022
Mar 31 2022
Mar 25 2022
Mar 24 2022
Mar 23 2022
Mar 21 2022
Mar 17 2022
Mar 16 2022
Mar 15 2022
Feb 15 2022
Feb 8 2022
Feb 3 2022
Jan 31 2022
I agree
Jan 29 2022
I've thought of mentioning here a couple of issues that I've seen come up again over the past few days:
Jan 28 2022
Jan 27 2022
Jan 20 2022
Is there a reason not to close this task?
Is there a reason not to close this task?
Jan 12 2022
Jan 11 2022
Jan 10 2022
Jan 4 2022
The strategy is defined in this task.
The creation of the strategy is now resolved.
Jan 3 2022
In T3134#76032, @vlorentz wrote:wishlist: it would be nice ot be able to check the whole hash of a revision/release even when the author name/email are replaced by a hash. (eg. by making SWHIDv2 a tree hash)
Dec 17 2021
wishlist: it would be nice ot be able to check the whole hash of a revision/release even when the author name/email are replaced by a hash. (eg. by making SWHIDv2 a tree hash)
Dec 16 2021
I guess https://grafana.softwareheritage.org/d/d3l2oqXWz/s3-object-copy?orgId=1 is almost an answer to this task
Dec 15 2021
Dec 13 2021
Dec 8 2021
In T3134#75077, @anlambert wrote:SWHID v2 should also prevent the hash collision issues we are currently facing (some related to the SHAttered attack on SHA1), see T3775 and SWH-LOADER-GIT-JT.
Dec 7 2021
SWHID v2 should also prevent the hash collision issues we are currently facing (some related to the SHAttered attack on SHA1), see T3775 and SWH-LOADER-GIT-JT.
Nov 26 2021
Nov 25 2021
I changed to mdi-anvil so that might help relate to a forge ;)
Choosing the right icon for the new menu entry is hard.
The currently chosen and demonstrated in the previous comment is 'mdi-content-save-all'.
Nov 23 2021
Nov 19 2021
Listing and submission view with a standard user (or anonymous):
Nov 17 2021
Nov 15 2021
Nov 9 2021
Is the request for regular pulling?
In T1538#73659, @moranegg wrote:Is the request for regular pulling?
If yes, it should be added for visibility on the home page of the archive.
If no, it should be clear this is a one shot thing.
Nov 8 2021
This is an example of a use-case in Open Science:
An institution has a forge and wishes to add the forge as a whole to SWH.
Nov 4 2021
Current status:
Following the last discussions, the current track I'm trying to implement is to create a grafana dashboard displaying the current status of the infrastructure.
To do so, some information managed by grafana should be displayed like the end-to-end checks status.