Is this task still valid ?

Fixed in rDWAPPS8c7829a8a4d1d7eddc597c2753ecd44953fcfc38

Hi @moranegg, Do you want us to use https://github.com/citation-file-format/cff-converter-python for parsing or just use its CITATION.cff file while testing(and parse everything using pyYAML)?

Hello all, I'm one of the CFF co-leads. Let me know if you need help with anything.

I do not think that issue is valid as here we are browsing a directory in the context of a snapshot, plus the snapshot id is well present in the title.

https://github.com/citation-file-format/cffconvert-github-action
https://github.com/citation-file-format/cff-converter-python

Closing at it's not relevant anymore

I tried this one and the build is failing because of adding 'metadata' in _TEST_ORIGINS entries. I will fix it soon but can someone suggest to me how to write better test cases for this one? I am new to testing and I didn't exactly understand what @vlorentz meant here by saying 'searching for a subset of this metadata'.

@KShivendu The URL is wrong, because the last %3B isn't escaped. The SWHID is swh:1:cnt:f10371aa7b8ccabca8479196d6cd640676fd4a04;origin=https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt;visit=swh:1:snp:b37d435721bbd450624165f334724e3585346499;anchor=swh:1:rev:259d0612af038d14f2cd889a14a3adb6c9e96d96;path=/html/semantics/document-metadata/the-meta-element/pragma-directives/attr-meta-http-equiv-refresh/support/x%3Burl=foo so the URL should be https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:cnt:f10371aa7b8ccabca8479196d6cd640676fd4a04;origin=https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt;visit=swh:1:snp:b37d435721bbd450624165f334724e3585346499;anchor=swh:1:rev:259d0612af038d14f2cd889a14a3adb6c9e96d96;path=/html/semantics/document-metadata/the-meta-element/pragma-directives/attr-meta-http-equiv-refresh/support/x%253Burl=foo/

Thank you very much @zack 🤗

Hello @moranegg, I am new here and I have made a draft for this task. I also noticed that the last example URL in Software Heritage Resolver subsection returns 404. But after truncating the URL a little bit, I got this - which is a valid object. What should I do?

@KShivendu it sounds like you haven't installed the various swh-* modules with pip -e. Did you follow the developer setup tutorial? Steps in there should take care of that.

Hello, I am new here and I completed this task and while committing I got the following error :

(I'm marking this as easy hack as it's suitable for newcomers)

Thanks for the merge :-) It feels really good to see a commit, however simple, being merged on a Monday morning!

bin/update contains

Thanks for the bug report. Do you have a log of what happens upon bin/update if pre-commit is missing? (it's sure is needed for committing, but i'm surprised it's needed for bin/update).
Also, is it needed for a raw "bin/update" or only for "bin/update -i" (that also install Python dependencies?).

In T2917#55617, @zvr wrote:

Please, not only document but add to the code something like
python_requires='>=3.7'
to setup.py so that the Pypi packages are not installable in older versions.

Please, not only document but add to the code something like
python_requires='>=3.7'
to setup.py so that the Pypi packages are not installable in older versions.

I elevated the priority of this task because I have done a demo yesterday and it would be better to have the chosen icon in a top menu

this has been fixed a while ago by D2669