- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Jan 21 2020
Jan 14 2020
Jan 10 2020
@anlambert thanks!
I'll do the translation so I'm claiming the task.
Jan 9 2020
Jan 8 2020
@anlambert: great. Thanks !
Jan 7 2020
Dec 20 2019
Dec 19 2019
Dec 17 2019
@vlorentz : If you can check the Slug in the deposit DB of this artifact, it might be je-suis-gpl
And do the deposit with the same Slug for linking purposes.
The deposit is visible and accessible on HAL without a link to SWH (because we rejected it).
- this ticket is open on HAL side as well, but I don't know at what priority level.
- we do check and than we reject it (this is why there is no link)
- I tagged it with [HAL] because I assume we want to keep the rejection but we need to make sure it is fixed
I can change the title to Make sure this is fixed
Dec 16 2019
Dec 14 2019
This might be resolved with T2149 ?
Dec 12 2019
Dec 11 2019
Dec 6 2019
Opened this issue to inform Dirk Roorda:
https://github.com/annotation/text-fabric/issues/54
Looks good to me too :-)
Oh I see..
I was just referencing the documentation and I saw that and it seemed like an error.
But I remember now we already had this discussion.
I would show the same page as without the /1, if possible...
In any case a 404, looks like an error..
Dec 5 2019
Dec 4 2019
Dec 2 2019
Nov 29 2019
Nov 28 2019
Nov 22 2019
@vlorentz I'm not convinced about having the url in the text of the badge.
I understand that a fork can use the "wrong" badge, by using the main repository's badge.
But the sha1 is already very long for a badge and this is really kind of a gimmick link :-)
Nov 20 2019
Thanks for the images at the beginning of the diff, the badges are very cool !
I pinged @marla.dasilva to see the result and we might want to change the colors to more positive colors.
We are planning to meet about that on Friday, maybe we can even show it to @rdicosmo :-)
Nov 19 2019
I don't feel comfortable to accept revisions, globally... but your diff looks solid.
Nov 15 2019
Nov 14 2019
review template with:
- @software for the software concept/project
- @softwareversion for a specific release
- @insoftware for a specific artifact in the software (e.g revision, directory, file)
Nov 12 2019
A full deposit from HAL doesn't work.
It seems to be on HAL side, the deposits stay in partial status and aren't digested.
On HAL interface after moderation there is "Application Error".
I signalled this to Bruno and he said he's fixing it.
Nov 8 2019
Nov 7 2019
Nov 6 2019
In D2216#52215, @vlorentz wrote:In D2216#52210, @moranegg wrote:This is already done, else you wouldn't be able to read the code :)
Nov 5 2019
Note that this doesn't solve the question of pulling release notes from e.g. GitHub release pages, which is something that would need to be done by some other component (T17 comes to mind).
Oct 30 2019
Oct 28 2019
review template with @software and @softwareversion entries
Oct 25 2019
Oct 21 2019
@anlambert thanks for the detailed explanation !