Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/180/ for more details.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Oct 14 2019
Add missing type annotations
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/179/ for more details.
- debian: Simplify build revision code
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/178/ for more details.
- debian: Remove dead code
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/177/ for more details.
- package.loader: Clarify download_package contract
- package.debian: Compute the dsc information
- debian: Remove duplicated computations step
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/176/ for more details.
Improve docstrings
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/175/ for more details.
Branch diff to debian-loader branch
Oct 13 2019
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/174/ for more details.
Remove unneeded overridden implementation (gnu)
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/173/ for more details.
- package: Fix py3.5 incompatibilities
Build has FAILED
Build has FAILED
Build has FAILED
- package.loader: Fix type check annotation invalid in py3.5
Build has FAILED
Build has FAILED
In D2135#49709, @ardumont wrote:Build has FAILED
I'm not sure the ci can build a diff when not on master...
[tox] $ git reset --hard origin/master HEAD is now at c0af471 tox.ini: Fix py3 environment to only tests the swh/loader tests [tox] $ git clean -fd -f [tox] $ git submodule update --init --recursive [tox] $ arc patch --diff 7167 --nocommit --nobranch --force --conduit-uri=https://forge.softwareheritage.org/ ********This diff is against origin/package-loader...
Build has FAILED
Oct 12 2019
Build has FAILED
Oct 1 2019
For the following, we will focus on package loader metadata.
Sep 30 2019
Sep 28 2019
Sep 27 2019
Sep 24 2019
roh, i did not want to close it...
I just wanted to update the diff... oh, well!
Apr 8 2019
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/113/ for more details.
- test_utils: Use @patch directly to declare expected behavior
@patch('foo') def test_bar(foo): foo.return_value = 42 pass # ...
Apr 6 2019
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/112/ for more details.
In a further step, it'd be nicer to make the loader-core counters compatible with the parsing done in swh.storage, so we can get a breakdown of operations per loader without jumping through too many hoops
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/104/ for more details.
Remove badly named counter
Apr 5 2019
Apr 4 2019
It feels a little weird to have different counters in the dict and in the logs, but this is after filtering out the existing objects so the difference should be minimal anyway.
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/103/ for more details.
Build has FAILED
Apr 3 2019
Build has FAILED
Fix api call to origin_visit_update api
Build has FAILED
snapshot_add now takes a list of snapshot as input
In D1337#28947, @olasd wrote:I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to just turn the counter attribute into a dict compatible with the output of the storage functions...
I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to just turn the counter attribute into a dict compatible with the output of the storage functions...
Build has FAILED
Feb 19 2019
Jan 8 2019
Dec 13 2018
Dec 5 2018
Resolved by D770.
Dec 4 2018
Nov 27 2018
Oct 31 2018
Oct 10 2018
Oct 4 2018
Oct 3 2018
Jul 23 2018
Jun 27 2018
Apr 11 2018
Mar 9 2018
Well, after much digging documentations and some tryouts. Finally gave in to solution 3.
Mar 7 2018
|---------------------------------+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------+------------------------------------| | Possible solution | Pros | Cons | Question | |---------------------------------+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------+------------------------------------| | 8. Celery signal on postrun | - separation of concern | Not working, in OOM kill | Documentation [3] | | | | scenario, task is killed | | | | | (tested) | | |---------------------------------+---------------------------------------+---------------------------------+------------------------------------|
Mar 5 2018
Still asserting the possibilities (and reading documentation):
So far, the solutions i foresee: