Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DWAPPS/job/tox/505/ for more details.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Jun 19 2019
Rebase; update client_id to match class hierarchy
Build has FAILED
There are two separate use cases here, so I'll comment on them separately:
Rebase
Test failures are not your fault, I'm working on it
Build has FAILED
Build has FAILED
From your comments, we can specify the following:
A deposit containing release metadata (softwareVersion, releaseNote) is a release software artifact.
The metadata that arrives with a deposit MUST use CodeMeta vocabulary (this should be reviewed following T1345).
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DDEP/job/tox/159/ for more details.
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDHG/job/tox/28/ for more details.
Build has FAILED
fix version string
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DCIDX/job/tox/556/ for more details.
Because Jenkins timeouted while compiling the package so it did not send it to PyPI the first time. I'm triggering a rebuild
Don't know why the build now.
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDNPM/job/tox/30/ for more details.
bump swh-storage version.
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDNPM/job/tox/29/ for more details.
Build has FAILED
Made changes as advised
Build has FAILED
unify docstrings
Thanks for the fix!
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DJNL/job/tox/170/ for more details.
That's even clearer than before!
they are never read. origin-id is not even set by listers, and description is only set by half of them, so even if we had a use case for it, we would have to repopulate the table before using it.
And description belongs in the extrinsic metadata workflow anyway.
Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLS/job/tox/204/ for more details.
In D1606#36409, @ardumont wrote:They are useless.
Yes, well, can you please develop a bit more?
Sounds good.
rebase
Sounds good to me.
Can you please try and fix the build?
Can you land and tag the loader-core's changes to ensure this build is fine?
sound good to me