- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Sep 27 2021
To ensure everything is working well with that patch, we executed multiple ingestions with and without the patched [1] dulwich version.
Build is green
Build is green
Build is green
Build is green
Update
Update
Build is green
Fix range commit
Update
Adapt according to both suggestions (NewType + explanatory comment)
I forgot to mention that the patched dulwich locally and then the loader-git's tests are fine as well.
In D6347#164631, @vlorentz wrote:Why?
In D6316#164424, @ardumont wrote:You may use fcntl.flock for this
I mean using an empty (lock) file in the opam_root directory.
See also 3rd party libraries like https://pypi.org/project/filelock/
@douardda I've started a work [1] on this.
But in the end, i don't think that's the quite needed.
The expected workers for loading will actually be deployed with a concurrency of 1 [2]
(and the lister will run once a day).What do you think?
[1] D6337
Build is green
Adapt according to discussion with @douardda (production flag is a better name than
maintenance_mode).
Rebase
Better commit message
typos
In D6346#164633, @vlorentz wrote:I don't see why (I'm guessing for simplification), but ok
Rebase
Build is green
- Clarify local/remote heads type as those are hexadecimal bytes str
- Use correct logging instruction, let log.info format entries