Differential D2135
package.debian: Re-implement debian loader within the package loader mechanism Authored by ardumont on Oct 12 2019, 7:58 PM. Tags Subscribers None
Details
This introduces the debian package loader. Contrary to other package loaders, a package can have multiple artifacts (per package version). In those terms, we had to slightly adapt the swh.loader.package.loader.PackageLoader to demonstrate this. tox
Diff Detail
Event TimelineThere are a very large number of changes, so older changes are hidden. Show Older Changes Comment Actions Build is green Comment Actions Build is green Comment Actions
Comment Actions Build is green Comment Actions Add test to demonstrate we visit twice the artifacts for 2 visits (with no Comment Actions Build is green Comment Actions Build is green Comment Actions
Comment Actions Build has FAILED Link to build: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/198/ Comment Actions Build has FAILED Link to build: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/199/ Comment Actions Build has FAILED Link to build: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/200/ Comment Actions
Because when i updated the diff against origin/master, it resetted the build's setup to build against origin/package-loader. Comment Actions Build has FAILED Link to build: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/201/ Comment Actions
something is off in the npm test... Comment Actions Build has FAILED Link to build: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/205/ Comment Actions Build has FAILED Link to build: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/206/ Comment Actions
Ok, the head target for npm is 0.0.2 instead of 0.0.4 in the ci job (it's consistently ok locally :/) Comment Actions Build has FAILED Link to build: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/207/ Comment Actions
and pypi
ok that was one pb
wrongly we are off in our snapshot branch computations Here is the snapshot for the ci: {'branches': {b'HEAD': {'target': b'releases/0.0.2', 'target_type': 'alias'},
b'releases/0.0.2': {'target': b'\xd8\xa1\xc7GM)V\xacY\x8a\x19\xf0'
b'\xf2}R\xf7\x01_\x11~',
'target_type': 'revision'},
b'releases/0.0.3': {'target': b'_\x9e\xb7\x8a\xf3\x7f\xfd\x12'
b'\x94\x9f#^\x86\xfa\xc0H'
b'\x98\xf9\xf7*',
'target_type': 'revision'},
b'releases/0.0.4': {'target': b'\xba\x01\x9b\x19+\xdb\x94\xbd'
b'\x0b[\xd6\x8b:_\x92\xb5'
b'\xac\xc2#\x9a',
'target_type': 'revision'}},
'id': b'b\xaf2\x0e\x106\xbe\xf9\x90FB\x08c\xc1ZD\x87\x0f\xb4%'}the alias branch targets 0.0.2 but we expect it to be 0.0.4. Comment Actions
Comment Actions Build is green Comment Actions
Comment Actions Build is green Comment Actions Build is green |