In order to understand each other, we must define clearly what we are dealing with:
What's a(n):
- entity
- project
- source
- origin
- etc...
And document this somewhere outside of the data model, the wiki seems like the right place for now.
Description
Description
Related Objects
Related Objects
- Mentioned Here
- T385: rename wg.s.o to wiki.s.o
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
there is now a page on the WG wiki to do this: https://wg.softwareheritage.org/index.php?title=Glossary
once the main wiki is open to the public, it should probably be moved there
Comment Actions
We need at least a draft of the glossary in good shape before the grand opening.
Remember to do this on: https://wg.softwareheritage.org/index.php?title=Glossary
Comment Actions
Since T385 has been closed, the Glossary page is at https://wiki.softwareheritage.org/index.php?title=Glossary.
Comment Actions
I've reviewed @olasd entries and completed some more.
I've also standardized how we add common information to terms, e.g. "Examples:" sections, or "Also known as:" and "Note:".
I quite like the current content of that page. We will certainly need to add more in the future, but I think this is a pretty decent status already.
@rdicosmo: do you agree? can we close this task and consider it done for the upcoming launch?
If not: what is missing that you consider blocking for the launch?
Comment Actions
Still missing quite a few entries but the foundations are there, so Ok for
closing this.... it will grow by itself now
Roberto Di Cosmo (via mobile/cell)
Le 25 juin 2016 9:03 PM, "zack (Stefano Zacchiroli)" <
forge@softwareheritage.org> a écrit :
zack edited projects, added General; removed Wiki.
zack added a comment.I've reviewed @olasd https://forge.softwareheritage.org/p/olasd/
entries and completed some more.
I've also standardized how we add common information to terms, e.g.
"Examples:" sections, or "Also known as:" and "Note:".I quite like the current content of that page. We will certainly need to
add more in the future, but I think this is a pretty decent status already.@rdicosmo https://forge.softwareheritage.org/p/rdicosmo/: do you agree?
can we close this task and consider it done for the upcoming launch?
If not: what is missing that you consider blocking for the launch?*TASK DETAIL*
https://forge.softwareheritage.org/T268*EMAIL PREFERENCES*
https://forge.softwareheritage.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/*To: *zack
*Cc: *olasd, rdicosmo, zack, ardumont