We expect svn loading to be slower than git loading in general, but it would be useful to have a comparison baseline to make sure we are not doing worse than the state-of-the-art in svn loading.
Comparing the performances of our svn loader with those of git-svn on a medium/large repository is a good way to test that.
(hat tip to @rdicosmo for the suggestion)
| Status | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Object (Maniphest Task) | ||||
| Migrated | gitlab-migration | T367 ingest Google Code repositories | ||
| Migrated | gitlab-migration | T617 ingest Google Code Subversion repositories | ||
| Unknown Object (Maniphest Task) | ||||
| Unknown Object (Maniphest Task) | ||||
| Unknown Object (Maniphest Task) | ||||
| Migrated | gitlab-migration | T328 svn / subversion loader | ||
| Migrated | gitlab-migration | T386 compare svn loader performances with git-svn | ||
| Migrated | gitlab-migration | T410 Compare swh-loader-svn which injects in swh-storage remotely with bare git-svn which clones on disk | ||
| Migrated | gitlab-migration | T411 Compare swh-loader-svn's hash computation with git-svn's |
(how do we make link to comment on phab?)
Every comment has a date which is a permalink to the comment, just use that link directly, or add the trailing #something part to the task name, e.g.: T411#6857