rendered:
Details
Details
- Reviewers
ardumont - Group Reviewers
Reviewers - Commits
- rDDEP459e373b6f1b: Document the loading workflow.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rDDEP Push deposit
- Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable. - Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Build is green
Patch application report for D5495 (id=19644)
Rebasing onto 829c65e419...
Current branch diff-target is up to date.
Changes applied before test
commit 459e373b6f1b4518929bbccea182dfd92d505dbc
Author: Valentin Lorentz <vlorentz@softwareheritage.org>
Date: Tue Apr 13 15:35:22 2021 +0200
Document the loading workflow.See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DDEP/job/tests-on-diff/634/ for more details.
| docs/images/deposit-workflow-checking.uml | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 | why not adding an alternative scenario about the failing case when the deposit is marked in rejected? | |
| docs/images/deposit-workflow-checking.uml | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 | (it may be enough without it so meh) | |
| docs/images/deposit-workflow-checking.uml | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 | every step can fail, and I don't want to overload the diagram I think it's implicit that anything can make it go to the "failed" state | |