Adding the missing swh.auth[django] for the deposit build so now it's fine.
At the same time, add also the reference to the new swh.counters.
This should fix the build, it did locally.
Related to T3172
Details
Details
- Reviewers
vlorentz - Group Reviewers
Reviewers - Maniphest Tasks
- T3172: swh-docs: Unstuck build
- Commits
- rDDOCaba3f30b82f7: docs: Update with new modules swh.auth and swh.counters
tox -e sphinx is happy
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rDDOC Development documentation
- Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable. - Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
The publish failure uses the 'sphinx' one though... [1]
I'll check now
Reproduced locally now.
It's better to try and fix things heh.
[1] I did not try that one as i thought (without checking d'oh) it would publish...
Comment Actions
and btw, the right fix for that error would be to depend on swh.deposit[swh-server]; but it's good to also include these missing modules
| docs/index.rst | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62 | "Next generation" is a temporary state ;) | |
| docs/index.rst | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62 | lol, i just copy/pasted the readme over there. | |
Comment Actions
Sorry to be annoying, but "SWH object counters scaffolding" isn't a great description, because it sounds like "object counter scaffholding for SWH".
What about "service providing efficient estimates of the number of objects in the SWH archive, using Redis's Hyperloglog"?
Comment Actions
Reword swh.counters description
It's not annoying when it's constructive (it often is ;).
The only annoyance i get with this (independently from your remark) is that we are not
really dry. We are duplicating information outside of the concerned repository. But I
don't have anything better so, there adapted.
Comment Actions
This is documentation. It can't be both didactic and DRY.
And by definition, a table of content is the opposite of DRY.