Details
- Reviewers
- None
- Group Reviewers
Reviewers - Maniphest Tasks
- T2791: Some swh-search tests are failing since the release of elasticsearch 7.10
tox
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rDSEA Archive search
- Branch
- master
- Lint
No Linters Available - Unit
No Unit Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 17785 Build 27490: Phabricator diff pipeline on jenkins Jenkins console · Jenkins Build 27489: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Build is green
Patch application report for D4679 (id=16606)
Rebasing onto 27f82bafea...
Current branch diff-target is up to date.
Changes applied before test
commit c8a21a64b5d10f99a2863289834afd5f5bbcbd20 Author: Antoine R. Dumont (@ardumont) <ardumont@softwareheritage.org> Date: Tue Dec 8 09:38:38 2020 +0100 Explain the current caveats on 7.10.0 in the readme Otherwise, you might see tests failing as explained in T2791 Related to T2791
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DSEA/job/tests-on-diff/52/ for more details.
README.md | ||
---|---|---|
34 | what does that mean? |
Not sure the debian specific part is needed here. It's only a transient problem that will hit very few (most probably swh team mate only) people.
Also the "Currently" in not appropriate, there is not any chance the 7.10.0 will be updated, so the I'd get rid of the "currently" in this caveat entry description.
Not sure the debian specific part is needed here. It's only a transient problem that will hit very few (most probably swh team mate only) people.
Well, i opened this to avoid losing the particular setup i had to install for my diffs (now landed) to work.
I'm fine with the idea of not mentioning this at all as well. As i agree it's a transient problem [1]
[1] albeit particularly annoying one to me right now ;)
because it's in multiple dimensions (e.g. python, docker,
and i'm still currently fighting the debian dimension ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
for packaging swh-search ;)
README.md | ||
---|---|---|
34 | I don't have the specifics. So i gather it means something like, "when using the elasticsearch package, please just avoid 7.10.0". |
Let's drop this. At least, it's here so I can reference it if someone encounters the issue.