I don't think we should introduce a new set of ports for the "swh services" (i.e. the ports and services that are currently declared in swh-docs/docs/services.txt)

However, I'm fine with the idea of grouping the ports for the ancillary services in a fixed range, e.g. 51xx

In D911#19568, @olasd wrote:

I don't think we should introduce a new set of ports for the "swh services" (i.e. the ports and services that are currently declared in swh-docs/docs/services.txt)

However, I'm fine with the idea of grouping the ports for the ancillary services in a fixed range, e.g. 51xx

Yes, thx for mentioning the file, i did not remember where it was!

Also, I like the idea of 51xx, it's like the standard for admin service on ports below 1024 ;)

ardumont mentioned this in D912: Rewrite the 'How to use' section as a 'Quick Start'.Jan 11 2019, 1:36 PM

keep swh's services port to their default values

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B3526: Diff 3024.Jan 15 2019, 5:13 PM

douardda added a child revision: D954: Add an nginx service to group all http services on the same service endpoint.Jan 15 2019, 5:13 PM

douardda removed a child revision: D912: Rewrite the 'How to use' section as a 'Quick Start'.Jan 15 2019, 5:16 PM

rebased

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B3532: Diff 3030.Jan 15 2019, 5:20 PM

douardda added a child revision: D912: Rewrite the 'How to use' section as a 'Quick Start'.Jan 15 2019, 5:21 PM

rebased

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B3538: Diff 3034.Jan 15 2019, 5:30 PM