At the moment, the deposit deals only with the zip kinds (as per sword 2.0 specification).
Being more standard to be able to deal with more tarballs (.tar.*) would be a plus.
Description
Description
Related Objects
Related Objects
- Mentioned In
- rDDEP4b717cbeef4b: swh.deposit.api: Permit tar archives as well during update
rDDEP44ef74b14d6a: docs: Explicit the supported archive formats
rDDEPe959f2491d13: docs: Mention tarball archives support
rDDEP6683c6a73c7a: swh.deposit: Accept deposit with tarball archives
rDDEPcb319fc3a58f: swh.deposit: Improve archive formats support for checks (tarball)
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
so, what is actually supported in terms of format?
As per the current tarball loader:
- zip
- tar (gzip, bz2 and lzma)
Comment Actions
Great. Can we document this somewhere? (I'm guessing the official docs of the deposit would be the best place, but I haven't checked.)