At the moment, when depositing code the date used for the synthetic revision is the date of the deposit.
It should be the date when the source code was created (should be available in the metadata- dateCreated).
Unfortunately there is a bug on this regard, HAL is sending the wrong date- see T1636 .
| Status | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Migrated | gitlab-migration | T1581 Deposit: improvements | ||
| Migrated | gitlab-migration | T1646 Enable compliance scenario for deposits | ||
| Migrated | gitlab-migration | T1637 Adapt deposit's creation/publication date to the SWH data-structure |
As exchanged orally, this does not prevent us from fixing the deposit asap.
(The persistent id generated will not change through that modification).
| SWH | HAL | SWORD workflow |
| visit date | when HAL sent deposit to SWH after moderation | time-stamp of received deposit |
| author date | date de création | dateCreated |
| commit date | when deposit was received on HAL | datePublished |
Dates in metadata isn't mandatory.
When dateCreated or datePublished exists, use this date for both entries.
Otherwise use time-stamp of received\checked deposit for all dates.
@moranegg the task's title should be reworked as well. Possibly: Deposit: Adapt creation/publication date software workflow?