(No test yet as i'm trying to ensure i'm going the right way first)
Related to T3350
Differential D5802
backend: Allow lister exclusion from the grab_next_visit endpoint ardumont on May 31 2021, 3:19 PM. Authored by
Details
(No test yet as i'm trying to ensure i'm going the right way first) Related to T3350
Diff Detail
Event TimelineComment Actions I'd suggest using a simpler "lister_id not in (select id from lister where name in %s)" where clause to avoid having to add a join to the query. I'd even go as far as suggesting using a list of lister uuids directly instead (which avoids having to pass a complex filter with name and instance_name to the scheduling function). Comment Actions Build is green Patch application report for D5802 (id=20723)Rebasing onto 9f7ab8fcdc... Current branch diff-target is up to date. Changes applied before testcommit 1147d39ddde38409622b896129c698bda37cb977 Author: Antoine R. Dumont (@ardumont) <ardumont@softwareheritage.org> Date: Mon May 31 15:05:58 2021 +0200 backend: Allow lister exclusion from the grab_next_visit endpoint Related to T3350 See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DSCH/job/tests-on-diff/349/ for more details. |