This looks good ! are the error messages returned to the client as is?
I have a hard time with the error message. Maybe something like this:
"the url must be compatible with the client's domain name, its verification has failed"
I have a fail because the list of fields is not in the same order.
We don't have a fixed url field key, that's what the 'no url field' tries to convey.
What do you think of:
The order is not important so i'll change the way this is tested.
I'll also take care of the FIXM (line 76).
@moranegg Grrrr, i have pushed rather too fast (my fingers are faster than my shadow :)
So the diff is closed... (and not updated with the adaptations... T_T)
Here is the commit with the proposed changes though .
Please, tell me if you want me to adapt some things.