Details

Reviewers

Group Reviewers

Commits

rDLDBASE67b2b1dc9dd7: cran.loader: Simplify filename computation
rDLDBASE789536888eaf: loader.cran: Optimize visit on artifacts already seen
rDLDBASE1b39a610d860: package.utils: Extract artifact_identity into a utils function
rDLDBASEf5ea782f58d1: package.cran: Implement cran loader

Summary

which means:

add loader implementation with cli auto-registration (swh loader cran -h)
add task implementation with scheduler task auto-registration (task-type load-cran)
tested

Note:
The diff is annoyingly a tad big because i extracted common behavior functions in package.utils modules...

Related T2026

Test Plan

tox

Diff Detail

Repository

rDLDBASE Generic VCS/Package Loader

Branch

cran-loader

Lint

No Linters Available

Unit

No Unit Test Coverage

Build Status

Buildable 9845
Build 14531: tox-on-jenkins	Jenkins
Build 14530: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

ardumont created this revision.Dec 17 2019, 3:03 PM

Herald added a reviewer: Reviewers. · View Herald TranscriptDec 17 2019, 3:03 PM

ardumont added inline comments.Dec 17 2019, 3:04 PM

swh/loader/package/cran/tests/test_cran.py
81	Need to add loading tests scenario here

Build has FAILED

Link to build: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/279/
See console output for more information: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/279/console

Harbormaster failed remote builds in B9845: Diff 8756!Dec 17 2019, 3:05 PM

ardumont planned changes to this revision.Dec 17 2019, 3:05 PM

ardumont added inline comments.Dec 17 2019, 3:15 PM

swh/loader/package/cran/loader.py
46	Dict!
55	Mapping[str, Any]... -> Dict[str, Any]
123	Add gazillion tests on this.

loader: Implement more robust parsing date
Fix cli test
npm: Migrate interesting parsing function to utils module
cran: Build the loader cran's revision correctly + add loading test

Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/280/ for more details.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B9856: Diff 8763.Dec 17 2019, 7:12 PM

ardumont added inline comments.Dec 17 2019, 11:36 PM

swh/loader/package/cran/loader.py
145	I guess we should continue using format string for logging... I mean here, we should continue using: logger.warning('Fail to parse %s. Reason: %s', (date, e))

cran: Improve typing
cran.loader: Deal with date parsing corner case

Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/281/ for more details.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B9867: Diff 8770.Dec 18 2019, 6:53 PM

ardumont added inline comments.Dec 18 2019, 6:54 PM

swh/loader/package/cran/tests/test_cran.py
30	oh no! This peculiar case is dependent on the day this is computed. It was on the 17th: datetime(2011, 1, 17, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)), Today, the 18th, this fails with a result of: datetime(2011, 1, 18, 0, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc) Adding a corner case workaround for that (T.T)

douardda requested changes to this revision.Dec 19 2019, 11:19 AM

douardda added a subscriber: douardda.

douardda added inline comments.

swh/loader/package/cran/loader.py
25	why SPECIFIC? also, you can use a raw string instead of escaping \ chars.
101	since we do not deal with debian packages here, there should be an explanation for this. Even rename the function with comments explaining why we use Deb822 in there.
137	did I miss something? this is declared as `Optional[str]` just above, so the isinstance is quite suspicious...
144	since you do actually use the regex, this later should use named matches instead of using this ugly line of code (if I may ;-) ). I mean use [SPECIFIC_]DATE_PATTERN=r'(?P<year>\d{4})-(?P<month>\d{2})' as regex.
150	no need for this import to be local

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Dec 19 2019, 11:19 AM

ardumont added inline comments.Dec 19 2019, 11:24 AM

swh/loader/package/cran/loader.py
25	because it's a specific ugly pattern that does strange things. I want that to stand out somehow. I don't know how to call it properly though.
101	indeed, i explained it in the task but not in the code. will adapt.
137	it misses an or indeed ;) nice catch.
144	nice, thx (you may, i believe that it's the diff review's point ;)
150	i need to stop doing that...

Adapt according to review

(still need to rework the git history but let's agree on the implementation
first ;)

Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/282/ for more details.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B9890: Diff 8797.Dec 19 2019, 11:58 AM

Squash commits

Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/290/ for more details.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B9919: Diff 8826.Dec 20 2019, 9:59 AM

ardumont retitled this revision from cran: Add loader implementation to cran loader: Add implementation.Dec 20 2019, 10:00 AM

ardumont edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)

ardumont edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

ardumont added a project: Origin-CRAN.

Resolve revision from already seen artifacts
Improve loading tests

Build is green
See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDBASE/job/tox/291/ for more details.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B9920: Diff 8828.Dec 20 2019, 10:51 AM

ardumont edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)Dec 20 2019, 11:01 AM

did only a quick review, lgtm. Note however my comment on using path.basename() instead of path.split()[-1]

swh/loader/package/cran/loader.py
59	is there a reason not to use [os.]path.basename() here?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jan 6 2020, 2:00 PM

ardumont added inline comments.Jan 6 2020, 2:23 PM

swh/loader/package/cran/loader.py
59	i do not remember. The things that come to mind is possibly a trailing slash which got in the way... If that's the case, a comment would have been nice indeed.