By keeping trace of modules and sub-modules that were renamed we facilitate the usage of the SWH code base.
what would be the best option to keep this information so it is not lost?
and not too much work to maintain.
By keeping trace of modules and sub-modules that were renamed we facilitate the usage of the SWH code base.
what would be the best option to keep this information so it is not lost?
and not too much work to maintain.
Also, I'm searching for a page or image that shows the relations between modules.
might not be up-to-date but i think that's [1]
[1] https://docs.softwareheritage.org/devel/index.html#dependencies
@ardumont it is exactly the diagram I was looking for. Thanks!
I think we need a diagram that shows the functionality dependence between modules.