Change Details

Hello, Quoting and replying to your questions below. >> 1) is it possible to recover the SWHID information using the 'slug'? No, it's not possible currently. Well, with the swh deposit status in its current state. We could imagine improving the `swh deposit status` to allow this. Note that the result will most probably more than 1 deposit though. >> 2) is it possible to update some deposit (to add/correct some data >> field) using the already existing deposit-id? Yes, we can update deposit metadata information now on the swhid though [1] Only updating a `partial` deposit (not already ingested in the archive) is possible using the deposit id. [1] https://docs.softwareheritage.org/devel/swh-deposit/user-manual.html#metadata-only-deposit >> 3) in all the deposits, the names of the software authors are the same >> as the authors of the IPOL publications. But in some cases the source >> code includes other auxiliar source codes from another authors. These >> names have not been listed in the deposit. Is that right? Yes.

Hello, Quoting and replying to your questions below. >> 1) is it possible to recover the SWHID information using the 'slug'? No, it's not possible. >> 2) is it possible to update some deposit (to add/correct some data >> field) using the already existing deposit-id? Yes, we can update deposit metadata information now on the swhid though [1] Only updating a `partial` deposit (not already ingested in the archive) is possible using the deposit id. [1] https://docs.softwareheritage.org/devel/swh-deposit/user-manual.html#metadata-only-deposit >> 3) in all the deposits, the names of the software authors are the same >> as the authors of the IPOL publications. But in some cases the source >> code includes other auxiliar source codes from another authors. These >> names have not been listed in the deposit. Is that right? Yes.

Hello, Quoting and replying to your questions below. >> 1) is it possible to recover the SWHID information using the 'slug'? No, it's not possible currently. Well, with the swh deposit status in its current state. We could imagine improving the `swh deposit status` to allow this. Note that the result will most probably more than 1 deposit though. >> 2) is it possible to update some deposit (to add/correct some data >> field) using the already existing deposit-id? Yes, we can update deposit metadata information now on the swhid though [1] Only updating a `partial` deposit (not already ingested in the archive) is possible using the deposit id. [1] https://docs.softwareheritage.org/devel/swh-deposit/user-manual.html#metadata-only-deposit >> 3) in all the deposits, the names of the software authors are the same >> as the authors of the IPOL publications. But in some cases the source >> code includes other auxiliar source codes from another authors. These >> names have not been listed in the deposit. Is that right? Yes.