Change Details

Hello, sorry for the late reply. So, as zack mentioned, we did the changes. As we are working towards a consistent tool api interface though [1] (including the deposit client [2]), we'd like you to be able to use that interface. That'd avoid one more round-trip adaptation on your part. We should land this during the week. We will get back to you as soon as it's ready. [1] https://forge.softwareheritage.org/T1671 [2] https://forge.softwareheritage.org/D1428 Cheers, -- tony / Antoine R. Dumont (@ardumont)

Hello, sorry for the late reply. So, as zack mentioned, we did the changes. As we are working towards a consistent tool api interface though [1] (including the deposit client [2]), we'd like you to be able to use that interface in order to avoid one more round-trip adaptation on your part. We should land this during the week. We will get back to you as soon as it's ready. [1] https://forge.softwareheritage.org/T1671 [2] https://forge.softwareheritage.org/D1428 Cheers, -- tony / Antoine R. Dumont (@ardumont)

Hello, sorry for the late reply. So, as zack mentioned, we did the changes. As we are working towards a consistent tool api interface though [1] (including the deposit client [2]), we'd like you to be able to use that interface. That'd in order to avoid one more round-trip adaptation on your part. We should land this during the week. We will get back to you as soon as it's ready. [1] https://forge.softwareheritage.org/T1671 [2] https://forge.softwareheritage.org/D1428 Cheers, -- tony / Antoine R. Dumont (@ardumont)