Change Details

This would allow writing configurations like: ``` storage: - filter - buffer - cls: remote args: url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` instead of: ``` storage: cls: filter args: storage: cls: buffer args: storage: cls: remote args: url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` (example from D2275) I think I gives more readable configs, but on the other hand it adds more code to maintain. So I'm not sure if this is a good idea. Comments welcome.

This would allow writing configurations like: ``` storage: cls: pipeline args: steps: - filter - buffer - cls: remote args: url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` instead of: ``` storage: cls: filter args: storage: cls: buffer args: storage: cls: remote args: url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` (example from D2275) I think I gives more readable configs, but on the other hand it adds more code to maintain. So I'm not sure if this is a good idea. Comments welcome.

This would allow writing configurations like: ``` storage: - filtercls: pipeline args: steps: - filter - buffer - cls: remote args: url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` instead of: ``` storage: cls: filter args: storage: cls: buffer args: storage: cls: remote args: url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` (example from D2275) I think I gives more readable configs, but on the other hand it adds more code to maintain. So I'm not sure if this is a good idea. Comments welcome.