Change Details

This allows the premise of the scenario [1] to occur. Premise because the tids and bits about the metadata information to send to the metadata storage is not completely clear. A first review from @moranegg and @vlorentz to clarify that part would be nice. [1] Update metadata for deposit whose archive and metadata are already stored in the archive. Described in: https://hackmd.io/yUZAp78KTdSvE4drf0_MqQ#2-Cas-d%E2%80%99utilisations-contributeur-HAL

This allows the premise of the scenario [1] to occur. Premise because the tids and bits about the metadata information to send to the metadata storage is not completely clear. A first review from @moranegg and @vlorentz to clarify that part would be nice. [1] Update metadata for deposit whose archive and metadata are already stored in the archive. Described in: https://hackmd.io/yUZAp78KTdSvE4drf0_MqQ#2-Cas-d%E2%80%99utilisations-contributeur-HAL Depends on D4057

This allows the premise of the scenario [1] to occur. Premise because the tids and bits about the metadata information to send to the metadata storage is not completely clear. A first review from @moranegg and @vlorentz to clarify that part would be nice. [1] Update metadata for deposit whose archive and metadata are already stored in the archive. Described in: https://hackmd.io/yUZAp78KTdSvE4drf0_MqQ#2-Cas-d%E2%80%99utilisations-contributeur-HAL Depends on D4057