Change Details

This would allow writing configurations like: ```lang=yaml storage: cls: pipeline steps: - filter - buffer - cls: remote url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` or ```lang=yaml storage: cls: filter storage: cls: buffer storage: cls: remote url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` instead of: ```lang=yaml storage: cls: filter args: storage: cls: buffer args: storage: cls: remote args: url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` (example from D2275) I think I gives more readable configs, but on the other hand it adds more code to maintain. So I'm not sure if this is a good idea. Comments welcome.

This would allow writing configurations like: ```lang=yaml storage: cls: pipeline steps: - cls: filter - cls: buffer - cls: remote url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` or ```lang=yaml storage: cls: filter storage: cls: buffer storage: cls: remote url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` instead of: ```lang=yaml storage: cls: filter args: storage: cls: buffer args: storage: cls: remote args: url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` (example from D2275) I think I gives more readable configs, but on the other hand it adds more code to maintain. So I'm not sure if this is a good idea. Comments welcome.

This would allow writing configurations like: ```lang=yaml storage: cls: pipeline steps: - cls: filter - cls: buffer - cls: remote url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` or ```lang=yaml storage: cls: filter storage: cls: buffer storage: cls: remote url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` instead of: ```lang=yaml storage: cls: filter args: storage: cls: buffer args: storage: cls: remote args: url: http://swh-storage:5002/ ``` (example from D2275) I think I gives more readable configs, but on the other hand it adds more code to maintain. So I'm not sure if this is a good idea. Comments welcome.