That's great, thanks!

Thanks!

Seems right ;)

Build is green

Build is green

Build is green

Update requirements-swh.txt

All good points!
Thanks.

Build is green

Build is green

The change by itself looks fine, but the cursor manipulation logic is not sparking joy :-)

Build is green

• rebase
• rework commit message

Build is green

not sure about the db space as an argument, but the CPU is by itself worth the move IMHO.

now plz help me on P714 D:

Linking to T2474 which proposes to drop blake2 from content ;)
(so we can abandon this diff if we do drop it).

lol, do we open a new table for that kind of mistake (i think i also did that some time ago ;)

Build is green

oops, I wanted to make a paste

heads up on D3412 btw.

Build is green

Add tests for release/revision/directory/path validation.

That fixed issues as well along the way (uneventful status, mistyped snapshot).
Redeployed a 0.2.1 version.

Looks good.

We should really stop throwing an exception when encountering a svn:externals property as numerous svn repos use it
and the need for subversion repository archival is growing (Inria gforge for instance).

How about brainstorming again on T611 next week the day we meet @rdicosmo at the office ?

Accepted, with the following caveat: I'm still not sure what the plan is to deploy this now? In the current state of this diff, as soon as we deploy this on workers, data loss will occur (as the new extra_headers field isn't supported by swh.storage).

Build is green

Tests refactoring which uncover bugs, nice !

Build is green

Tests refactoring which uncover bugs, nice !

Build is green

Rebase

\o/

Drop last unused variable

Build is green

Nice improvement !

Drop some more dead code

Looks good.

Build is green

Build is green