functional tests

Client can request all the possible types in this case and the data requested under the right type will be returned.
https://forge.softwareheritage.org/D8312#216301:~:text=def%20test_get_release_target_unknown(client)%3A

docstring correction

Address review comments

Remove unnecessary comment

doc improvements

fix issues found in review

review comments

remove unused enum in schema

tests

swh-search integration

missing dependency

config

typo

Remove raw field from content

In D8239#214721, @vlorentz wrote:

What if we simply don't include this field for now, and add it later if needed?

This was we can take time to design it later when we have a use case; instead of designing it now in a way that cannot be changed without breaking backward compatibility

In D8239#214677, @anlambert wrote:

I could accept the diff but I think another team member should also review it and gives his opinion about the raw content data retrieval and integration in GraphQL responses.

Missing test

Add download URL for a content

rebase

Add missing property decorator

Add missing tests

flake8 fix

Add tests

remove unnecessary argument

merged

Remove match field
Rename searchSwhid to resolveSwhid

In D8231#214340, @anlambert wrote:

Looks good to me but still not really convinced by the match field in search results, we should only rely on the result ordering from the search backend imho.

Get content by hash_type:hash_value string

Add language and license fields