Changeset View
Standalone View
codemeta.json
- This file was added.
{ | |||||
"@context": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/codemeta/codemeta/2.0/codemeta.jsonld", | |||||
"@type": "SoftwareSourceCode", | |||||
"identifier": "5682a72dc61f86ae69f2841c2184d6159c0b6d5d", | |||||
"description": "Software Heritage Indexer for revisions and contents", | |||||
"name": "swh-indexer", | |||||
"codeRepository": "https://forge.softwareheritage.org/diffusion/78/", | |||||
"issueTracker": "https://forge.softwareheritage.org/maniphest/", | |||||
"license": "https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-3.0.html", | |||||
"version": "0.0.35", | |||||
"author": [ | |||||
{ | |||||
"@type": "Organization", | |||||
"name": "Software Heritage", | |||||
"url": "http://softwareheritage.org/", | |||||
ardumont: it works as is but `https://www.softwareheritage.org` sounds better :) | |||||
Not Done Inline Actionsagreed moranegg: agreed | |||||
"email": "swh-devel@inria.fr" | |||||
}, | |||||
], | |||||
"developmentStatus": "active", | |||||
"url": "https://github.com/SoftwareHeritage/swh-indexer/", | |||||
Not Done Inline ActionsNot sure what's the expected meaning of this URL, but it should either be the same of codeRepository, or the Software Heritage homepage, as we don't have a homepage for the specific indexer software component (yet). zack: Not sure what's the expected meaning of this URL, but it should either be the same of… | |||||
Not Done Inline ActionsActually this url is the only url linking this revision to the origin on SWH we should want people to give the github url (even if it is a mirror) because with the github url we can find the whole tree in our archive. we can put both urls as url or as codeRepository. the github one serves better with our linked data challenge. moranegg: Actually this url is the only url linking this revision to the origin on SWH
we should want… | |||||
Not Done Inline ActionsIf that's the problem you're trying to fix, than the right fix is adding to the list of origins that we track the URLs of our repos—which would be a good thing in general (see T807 which I've just submitted). zack: If that's the problem you're trying to fix, than the right fix is adding to the list of origins… | |||||
Not Done Inline Actionsdeleted funding and url terms moranegg: deleted funding and url terms | |||||
"funding":"Inria", | |||||
Not Done Inline Actionsdo we really need this? it's a kinda low-level business detail that I don't think should have any part in advertised metadata about our software products, and that might change in the future zack: do we really need this? it's a kinda low-level business detail that I don't think should have… | |||||
Not Done Inline ActionsWe don't need metadata- that's the point. This is an example to what we would like to find about other projects/software artifacts. The problem might occur if we don't remove it when the funding is over. moranegg: We don't need metadata- that's the point.
The question is what do we want?
This is an example… | |||||
"keywords": [ | |||||
"indexer", | |||||
"software", | |||||
"mimetype", | |||||
"ctags", | |||||
"language", | |||||
"fossology-license", | |||||
"metadata", | |||||
"metadata-detector", | |||||
"metadata-translator" | |||||
], | |||||
"softwareVersion":"0.0.35", | |||||
Not Done Inline ActionsWhat's the difference with the "version" key? ardumont: What's the difference with the "version" key? | |||||
Not Done Inline Actionsyou are right! moranegg: you are right!
I just submitted an issue with CodeMeta about it..
| |||||
"dateCreated":"2017-06-12", | |||||
"datePublished":"2017-06-12", | |||||
"programmingLanguage": "Python", | |||||
"relatedLink": "https://archive.softwareheritage.org/api/1/origin/git/url/https://github.com/SoftwareHeritage/swh-indexer" | |||||
Not Done Inline Actionswhat's the point of this? zack: what's the point of this?
as it's very uninformative, i suggest to remove it | |||||
Not Done Inline ActionsIf we want to provide the persistent solution for software
The main question is, how do we want others to "use" SWH, here I thought to put it as a relatedLink but you are right it is wrong So i will remove it, but I think we should show how we want to be used and push our way in... moranegg: If we want to provide the persistent solution for software
what do we provide?
- only the… | |||||
} |
it works as is but https://www.softwareheritage.org sounds better :)