First step toward T3985.
For now, this only checks the metadata exist, so it wouldn't catch the current
corruption issue yet.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
olasd - Group Reviewers
Reviewers - Maniphest Tasks
- T3985: deposit monitoring: check metadata
- Commits
- rDICPf45a54104015: deposit: Check created metadata is visible from the public API
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rDICP Icinga plugins
- Branch
- master
- Lint
No Linters Available - Unit
No Unit Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 27235 Build 42607: Phabricator diff pipeline on jenkins Jenkins console · Jenkins Build 42606: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Build has FAILED
Patch application report for D7278 (id=26358)
Rebasing onto 26a98cae80...
Current branch diff-target is up to date.
Changes applied before test
commit f45a54104015f97a0cdc164ea7d59089f9c0be35
Author: Valentin Lorentz <vlorentz@softwareheritage.org>
Date: Wed Mar 2 16:42:58 2022 +0100
deposit: Check created metadata is visible from the public APILink to build: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DICP/job/tests-on-diff/47/
See console output for more information: https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DICP/job/tests-on-diff/47/console
Comment Actions
Build is green
Patch application report for D7278 (id=26358)
Rebasing onto 26a98cae80...
Current branch diff-target is up to date.
Changes applied before test
commit f45a54104015f97a0cdc164ea7d59089f9c0be35
Author: Valentin Lorentz <vlorentz@softwareheritage.org>
Date: Wed Mar 2 16:42:58 2022 +0100
deposit: Check created metadata is visible from the public APISee https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DICP/job/tests-on-diff/48/ for more details.
Comment Actions
what values should we give to the new provider-url argument in the current icinga checks for staging and production? (the web-url one is easier :P)
Comment Actions
"Root URL of the deposit client, as defined in the " "'deposit_client.provider_url' column in the deposit DB"
just copy-paste from the DB values of staging and prod