Differential D6865
tests: Remove the SWHTag mock, use dulwich.objects.Tag instead. Authored by vlorentz on Dec 20 2021, 12:38 PM.
Details
This mock was clunky because it didn't actually behave much like Additionally, a future commit will need to access the as_raw_chunks()
Diff Detail
Event TimelineComment Actions Build is green Patch application report for D6865 (id=24876)Rebasing onto 715fbe212d... First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: tests: Remove the SWHTag mock, use dulwich.objects.Tag instead. Changes applied before testcommit 8d9642d37a4825b9c47d4ab17df694cfc51e160b
Author: Valentin Lorentz <vlorentz@softwareheritage.org>
Date: Mon Dec 20 12:38:25 2021 +0100
tests: Remove the SWHTag mock, use dulwich.objects.Tag instead.
This mock was clunky because it didn't actually behave much like
dulwich's Tag.
Additionally, a future commit will need to access the as_raw_chunks()
method of ShaFile objects, so SWHTag isn't suitable anymore as it
would need to diverge even more by implementing its own serialization.See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDG/job/tests-on-diff/157/ for more details. Comment Actions Build is green Patch application report for D6865 (id=24877)Rebasing onto 0cc96c25ab... First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Fast-forwarded diff-target to base-revision-158-D6865. Changes applied before testSee https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DLDG/job/tests-on-diff/158/ for more details. |