initiate an infrastructure section and a network sub-section
Remark: the png of the plantuml diagram is committed because
the svg in not correctly rendered
Related to T3203
Details
Details
- Reviewers
ardumont - Group Reviewers
Reviewers - Maniphest Tasks
- T3203: docs: Document the firewall installation and procedures
- Commits
- rDDOC7147b9c0cac2: document the firewalls upgrade procedure
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rDDOC Development documentation
- Branch
- master
- Lint
No Linters Available - Unit
No Unit Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 21376 Build 33204: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
- split procedure per firewall
- clarify the initial status before each section
- fix minor typos
Comment Actions
lgtm
couples of questions and suggestions inline. Request changes for the sake of those though.
| docs/images/network.png | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | there are 2 gateway inria ^. I gather it's for readability. or is it a typo on the vlan names? i don't recall what's the vlan 1330 (vs vlan 1300). | |
| docs/images/network.uml | ||
| 10 | ||
| 48 | ||
| 49 | i don't recall which vlan is it? (probably inria come to think of it since i don't see it declared in the firewall). What are the differences between the 2 gateways again? | |
| docs/infrastructure/network.rst | ||
| 92 | ||
| 126 | ? | |
| 147 | ||
| docs/images/network.uml | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49 | yes it's a typo, its 1300, our dedicated public vlan. It's just cosmetic to have a better organization of the graph. if the same gw is used for the 2 vlans, the rendering is broken. | |
| docs/images/network.uml | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49 | well it's 210 actually | |
Comment Actions
- rebase
- network schema:
- change the vlan order to be able to use only one gateway
- Adapt several labels
- rst: adatp according to the feebacks