Can be useful for testing without the full-blown SWH environment.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
ardumont - Group Reviewers
Reviewers - Commits
- rDVAUf87dd54d5d7b: cli: Add 'cook' command, to run cookers without Celery
rDVAU8f9a3f197746: Add in_memory_backend.py
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rDVAU Software Heritage Vault
- Branch
- master
- Lint
No Linters Available - Unit
No Unit Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 21116 Build 32769: Phabricator diff pipeline on jenkins Jenkins console · Jenkins Build 32768: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Build is green
Patch application report for D5640 (id=20125)
Rebasing onto 3ec2550051...
Current branch diff-target is up to date.
Changes applied before test
commit 74132a6be36b7aca8ea81ef9e6f60cbfc0203d7a
Author: Valentin Lorentz <vlorentz@softwareheritage.org>
Date: Thu Apr 29 09:51:04 2021 +0200
cli: Add 'cook' command, to run cookers without Celery
Can be useful for testing without the full-blown SWH environment.See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DVAU/job/tests-on-diff/68/ for more details.
| swh/vault/in_memory_backend.py | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53 | Great but can you split this new memory backend into its own commit? | |
Comment Actions
good idea.
lgtm.
i'd split the in-memory-vault-backend into its own commit though even if the implementation is incomplete.
| swh/vault/cli.py | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100 | Isn't there a get_cooker factory already in the vault? | |
| swh/vault/cli.py | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100 | there is, but it instantiate a backend itself, and it's just too much trouble to work around it otherwise | |
Comment Actions
Build is green
Patch application report for D5640 (id=20151)
Rebasing onto a1ca2a1966...
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: Add in_memory_backend.py Applying: cli: Add 'cook' command, to run cookers without Celery
Changes applied before test
commit b7e2a442287b26115bab1e54b1e3729f3bf222ae
Author: Valentin Lorentz <vlorentz@softwareheritage.org>
Date: Thu Apr 29 15:00:34 2021 +0200
cli: Add 'cook' command, to run cookers without Celery
Can be useful for testing without the full-blown SWH environment.
commit a3e325a6ce5855e87b6b3f3412e658a389483949
Author: Valentin Lorentz <vlorentz@softwareheritage.org>
Date: Thu Apr 29 15:00:22 2021 +0200
Add in_memory_backend.py
It will be useful to implement a cooker CLI without needing
an external storage backend.See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DVAU/job/tests-on-diff/69/ for more details.
| swh/vault/cli.py | ||
|---|---|---|
| 100 | ack ;) | |
Comment Actions
Build is green
Patch application report for D5640 (id=20152)
Rebasing onto a1ca2a1966...
Current branch diff-target is up to date.
Changes applied before test
commit f87dd54d5d7b3c5d4a9ecbb054e811e97031d237
Author: Valentin Lorentz <vlorentz@softwareheritage.org>
Date: Thu Apr 29 15:00:34 2021 +0200
cli: Add 'cook' command, to run cookers without Celery
Can be useful for testing without the full-blown SWH environment.
commit 8f9a3f197746a456fc61d9c2a5d443273fc406f6
Author: Valentin Lorentz <vlorentz@softwareheritage.org>
Date: Thu Apr 29 15:00:22 2021 +0200
Add in_memory_backend.py
It will be useful to implement a cooker CLI without needing
an external storage backend.See https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DVAU/job/tests-on-diff/70/ for more details.