Closes T2841.
Force a cache update on origin visits when last fetched more than one
day ago.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
zack - Group Reviewers
Reviewers - Maniphest Tasks
- T2841: FUSE: update cache with new origin visits
- Commits
- rDFUSEa6cef6bad56e: cache: update cache with new origin visits
rDFUSEb6e8cf744f3e: cache: add primary key to db tables
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rDFUSE FUSE virtual file system
- Branch
- feature/update-cache-new-origin-visits
- Lint
No Linters Available - Unit
No Unit Test Coverage - Build Status
Buildable 17958 Build 27743: Phabricator diff pipeline on jenkins Jenkins console · Jenkins Build 27742: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Build is green
Patch application report for D4744 (id=16799)
Rebasing onto 7154e451ff...
Current branch diff-target is up to date.
Changes applied before test
commit a2ce5ab4fa491e4fd1865cc0b0deefef75d7eeaf
Author: Thibault Allançon <haltode@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Dec 15 14:20:48 2020 +0100
cache: update cache with new origin visits
Closes T2841.
Force a cache update on origin visits when last fetched more than one
day ago.
commit dd96749820b159fc85d4a4608a7862d2458d7d58
Author: Thibault Allançon <haltode@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Dec 15 14:47:51 2020 +0100
cache: add primary key to db tablesSee https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DFUSE/job/tests-on-diff/238/ for more details.
| swh/fuse/cache.py | ||
|---|---|---|
| 125 | is this needed now that you're making the "swhid" column a primary key? | |
| 130 | Minor naming issue: this is more like "fetch" than "last_fetched", because due to the primary key you will never have more than one entries for the same URL. All in all, something with "time" in the name would be more idiomatic, like "itime" (for "insertion time [in cache]"). | |
| 132 | ditto | |
| 153 | not sure why you want to make timestamp checking optional (do we have a use case for that?), but if you really do make the default True, because that's the sane cache semantics | |
Comment Actions
- Rebase on master
- Fix zack comments
| swh/fuse/cache.py | ||
|---|---|---|
| 125 | Indeed, unique and primary keys already have an index associated (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3379292/is-an-index-needed-for-a-primary-key-in-sqlite). Thanks for the catch! | |
Comment Actions
Build is green
Patch application report for D4744 (id=16826)
Rebasing onto 9546ba2f7b...
Current branch diff-target is up to date.
Changes applied before test
commit a6cef6bad56e709fff28a1287031a481e37c097b
Author: Thibault Allançon <haltode@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Dec 15 14:20:48 2020 +0100
cache: update cache with new origin visits
Closes T2841.
Force a cache update on origin visits when last fetched more than one
day ago.
commit b6e8cf744f3e4c1e16fd1eca6d4ae98629d39613
Author: Thibault Allançon <haltode@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Dec 15 14:47:51 2020 +0100
cache: add primary key to db tablesSee https://jenkins.softwareheritage.org/job/DFUSE/job/tests-on-diff/240/ for more details.